H264 vs h265 reddit. 264 and is designed for high-resolution videos.

H264 vs h265 reddit Intraframe means that the compression is done within the frame itself. Jul 27, 2024 · This will explain H264 versus H265 a little better and show why you may be experiencing issues at night. YouTube will take your h. 8GB to 2. 265 (HEVC). A high quality one that doesn’t lose visual fidelity from that encoding. 265 coming up quite frequently. 264/H. 265 are both fine BUT, they come in a Ton of flavors. 264 kind which use a lot more hard drive space. x265 is a head and neck better than x264 in terms of quality and compression H265 is a real crapshoot, I use Dahua and HikVison cams in H265 mode and only half my PCs will handle exported H265 video fine. The first comparison shows AV1 looking worse than the higher bitrate h. If you're looking for a lot of h. 264, H. Smaller than that, you might be better off with the h264 ones, assuming you don't care about storage space or bandwidth. 265 at 100mbps Luma PSNR when compared to the uncompressed source were as follows (higher = better:) h. Discussion r/MediaServer • The main benefit of h265 on 1080p video seems to be lower bitrates and lower filesize (which really only ticks one box). 265 is giving you the shooting specs you want, then shoot in that. 264, so at the same bitrates, HEVC will get significantly better quality. 265 version of the movie is being transcoded to H. But I do keep hearing how great AV1 is. Switching to H265 NVEnc is twice faster, and the file size is about 1/3 smaller. In theory 265 should be around 30% smaller for the same quality. 264 encodes by my own subjective judgement. Some times you might get something of quite poor quality. Please see r/Save3rdPartyApps and this article for more information: https://www. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now most of the improvements since then, h263, h264, h265, av1 are just slightly improvements on the But I'm guessing once you get past 300 bitrate on H. 264 vs. 265 (HVEC) is more efficient but also a bit more involved, not every player can decode it and/or might buffer on low end hardware. H265, what reigns supreme? H. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. But on H264, it becomes around 500Mbps. The issue is that you need fast decoding for low latency, so a hardware decoder. Export the same frame in RAW, ProRes or DnxHr, and h. That's where it becomes easiest to see. Use ProRes, DNXHR, GoProCineform for editing. So, when downloading a file, I assume the quality of a h265 video would be better than a h264 video of the same file size. 264 file 25-50% larger than the HEVC file), h. Air Link uses H265 as default. 264 and H. It simply provides a smaller file size/lower bit rate for videos, which makes them FASTER to load on websites, as well as easier to transfer from person a to b. 264 should not look any different then h. So you could potentially get a better looking h. 264 file. If 10bit h264 or 10bit h265 makes a difference in Instagram, its maybe because the h265 video had a higher quality in general, so the transcoding turned out better. 264+ ends up looking more clear. Streaming and Bandwidth: H. 265 did a considerably worse job encoding the noise. You will need to make sure that you either A have a more powerful playback device or B have a playback device with a dedicated HW decoder. 265 or H. If you're shooting on a GoPro, ProRes is overkill. Currently H. 264 encoding is less processor intensive and is compatible with more video editors. 265 is 300 mb. r/ATT stands with the Reddit community in protest of the API changes. h. 264 has a more varied spectrum of implementations because it is the most used video codec worldwide, thanks to YouTube. 265 delivery you need or want. I've been recording a lot of videos the past few months. 264: Generally requires a higher bitrate to achieve the same level of quality as H. Generally, for the same file size, h265 will look better. Two 10-second clips with no (or minimal) movement in the scene, it looks like: H264 41mbps 128. Just make sure you dial in the bit rate or you might not actually be getting any benefits for storage size. Kind of would have been nice if you had air link at the same 400 for a better apples to apples comparison but I guess there is the fact one can probably run air link at 800-850 as well as VD at 400 so it may H265 is more useful for 2K & 4K, Than for FHD. The qualifier is always the bitrate. Insta360 Studio has a couple options for h. 264 from a software encoder at less than double the bitrate vs a hardware encoded h. I've compared NVENC HEVC and NVENC AV1 on a 4090. It would be like re-encoding all of your h. That’s typically what I stream. So if we use H264 on Air Link, we can use it at much higher bitrate. theverge. I don't plan to do any massive color grading for the documentary stuff, so 420 vs. Just like Intel QuickSync. 87. Full comparison between H. 264 encoding instead of H. 265 are aweful, except x265! H. Typically 4k footage is h265. I also noticed in games that I would get microstutters, that stutters also went away. That can be problematic for digital zooming with H265. Depending on the age of your hardware this may not be an issue but some older hardware can't handle h265 transcoding at all. All my other test files were about a 50% reduction. 265+ are the flexibility, bandwidth savings, and support for advanced features such as HDR. If you are not worried about the file size you can therefore improve the quality settings on h. It has mainly a better compression and a higher maximum frame size. 264 wasn't really effected much. For 1080p30 I'd pick 50 mbit MPEG2, 35 mbit h264 or 20 mbit h265. Your one issue you may run into is if the end users player does not support h265, then it will force transcode to h264. 2048 kbps might be enough for a low-motion scene, but a high-motion scene might be bitrate-starved. 5x the time. It seems like I'm constantly referring people to klicksphillip's videos on H265 lately :D. 265. 265). 265 at equivalent bitrates (so a much larger h. 265 than h. 265 at a bitrate which was sufficient for h. So if the frame rate, resolution, and bitrate are the same between the two options, h. Cameras h. So since they added H. blu ray discs already come in h264. 264 is commonly used for standard definition and HD content, while H. They were both given a 15 minute 1080p 60fps video at 22961kbps to export at 1080p 60fps with a target bitrate of 15000kbps. File size is a good benchmark but not a golden rule. 264 but a vast improvement in video quality. 265 can have higher quality at lower bitrate (meaning smaller filesize), but either format can have equally high quality at the expense of larger files. 264 encoded movie is direct streaming to my laptop and the H. 264 the GPU overload went away. 264 (early Blu-ray Discs may be encoded in MPEG-2 or VC-1, while new UHD discs are encoded in H. H264 for Blu rays and H265 for uhd blurays to maintain 10 bit hdr color. The H265 video looks like a terrible blocky mess after encoding, and it's also 3x smaller in size compared to the VP9 one. See this table for en/decoder support in Nvidia hardware. Frankly any of the long-GOP formats like h264 and h265 are going to give you Sad Times as an editing format. If h. A codec (H. I then just noticed, for the first time, that I am able to encode also at h265, so I changed the setting to h265, left the encoder at the default of "NVIDIA", and the final result looked exactly the same as the h264 file but was only 923 megs. As indicated in the images below, the H. 264, because I upload them to YouTube. 264 and is designed for high-resolution videos. I don’t understand why they would allow you to re-encode an h. 264 10bit. 264 ? Shouldn't it be the other way around? As the google suggested: "H. 264 or 5 video to a higher bitrate than it was originally recorded. You will get about 10-15% smaller files for the same if not better quality. What i guess you should study well are the codecs themselves and how the camera process each. Reply reply H. Both have good compression rates, h265 being the better of the 2, but the caveat is that transcoding h265 is a bit more CPU intensive than h264, so your media server, Plex/Emby/Jellyfin/etc will get hammered slightly harder w/ h265 files. Where that compromise falls is up to you. I've seen 1GB/ep h. HEVC compresses better. 265 are specifications. "Best" seems to change significantly in bitrate between encoders, Nvenc vs native, h. So if h. But I worry a bit about LongGOP vs. I'm not sure if x264/5 use CPU and if h264/5 use GPU. For comparison vvc is 10 times more computational more intensive than hevc on encode and two times on decode. Also X264 if set right will give near same file size as X265 with far better quality. As for containers, MP4 is the most common one. However at equivalent bitrates (so with the h. For some reason, I could not get my system (PC Plex Media Server, Xbox One X Plex app, OLED TV, Onkyo receiver) to recognize HDR using H264 10bit but it finally worked using all the same settings with H265 10bit. Interestingly, In starting to look into doing some re-encodes of some of my media to reduce disk space. 5 - 3h render time and VMAF of 98. You can only find a compromise between the loss of quality you would accept vs the reduction in file size you gain. H264 and h265 are video format specifications. My understanding of h265 is it does use less bandwidth than h264 but the algorithm is much more complex. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now H264 vs H265 . If you download the large image and zoom into the samples, h265 basically completely blurs together the detail in the pavers, whereas h264 is not much different than original. And it does take much longer to encode an h265 release. 264 is noticeably different. 264 (I think, I found it tricky to find a quick and simple explanation of that) so you might as well kick out the h. Well, honestly, I don't think I've ever noticed any quality loss with H264 at all. 264 for playback on my laptop which I guess explains the increased CPU usage. No. 265 file and convert to h. It's supposed to be a replacement for the "old", but widely supported and used H264. H264 and H265 are both lossy codecs. But the bitrate of the H265 NVEnc video is lower than the 264 one. It’s not breaking that should worry you as i guess both will handle -nearly- the same amount of bending. 265 does provide the smallest file sizes. . 264 with 500 Mbps (Encode Bitrate) on ODT I feel like I couldn't even see a single artifact / Blocky image. Sony a7siii shoots in a particularly special flavor of h. However, if the h265 files are smaller, it becomes harder to say - I'd say that even if the h265 files are 30% smaller, they'll still look better. The higher the quality of your original video the less advantage h265 make. Hard to overcome the 500 bitrate vs just 200 bitrate. If the bitrate is sufficient for the codec in question to produce clean output, then the visual result should not be something a person can distinguish. 264 yourself and make sure it’s up to your standards. Even though Premiere is fully able to handle H. Quick side note from my experience: If you absolutely care about quality, don't use bitrate-based encoding. There is a very good reason why ProRes and DNX (along with TIFF and other formats) are used as archive standards. 264+ 400 mode. As someone already mentioned it is also CPU dependent, takes more resources for video processing in order to play. Beyond a certain bit rate, other settings are going to effect the quality more. 265+ provide higher levels of compression, enabling more efficient delivery of UHD content. Because as the logic of H264 and H265 says, the H265 is 30-50% more efficient meaning for the same picture quality it saves about 30-50% of bandwidth/space, so by that meaning if you set the bit rate to 50 mbit on both, H265 should look like as if you were to set H264 to 70-80mbit which would be considerate improvement which I would be very H. A straight transcode of ProRes video to h. If you really want to split hairs, h. I just rendered a 7 minute video in mp4 h264 as I always do. I'll try to explain since the comment is aging, but I'm a noob at AV1, less noobish at video encoding tho: Keyframes are expensive, its kind of where the image gets fully redrawn, every other frame makes changes to the results of the previous frames. 265 video codec is 3-4 times faster than using H. For quality , it totally depends on the bitrate your video is saved at. 265) and a container (MP4, MKV) are two different things. Settings are 16 to 18 crf x264 slow and 18 to 20 crf x265 10 bit medium or slow based on if it's a favorite or not. 265 (HEVC) 4:4:4" column that the 4:4:4 chroma is not very widely supported for decoding, this is the one you would want to use for gaming though. If you have the same quality settings then you will have a vast difference in file size. You can upload prores mov's (at least on YouTube) if you absolutely want the highest quality and don't care about file size. X265 and AV1 don't compare to X264 in visual quality. And I can see the advantage of Av1 not having to need a really good wifi 6e router as well. So my question is, should i be using h265 codec (8 bit for the SDR version, and 10 bit for the HDR version)? H. Oct 15, 2023 · With video playback technology witnessing quite an evolution because of the increasing popularity of videos, we have the codec comparison of H. It's probably an issue on the encoding or decoding end and not just a bandwidth thing. HEVC is somewhere around 25-50% more efficient than h. Vvc vs av1 is Google open source vs paid mpeg proprietary codec vvc (h266). The normal H265 takes way too much time so I'd rather avoid that. 264 100M = 22dB h. AV1. Just like h264 vs vp8 and h265 (hevc) vs vp9. 264 had the same bitrate, h. Star wars a New Hope, Wrath of Kahn, Game of thrones X264 vs Reruns of Mash, Happy Days, and Rick and Morty H265 or AV1-STV. It’s just dumb. If bitrate is the same in both cases then h265 should always look better than h264. However i dont want to lose out on any quality. 265 is no worse than real time, probably faster. Historically I've seen between an 80% and 90% reduction in file size when doing this and very rarely notice any drop in quality. If you encode a video to both H264 and H265 using settings that produce similar results, the h265 file should be smaller. Remux VC-1 to h264 or h265 or have plex play nicely with VC-1? Help I started watching the movies I ripped from The Hitchcock Collection and am now just noticing that its in VC1 and falls apart whenever I play it through Plex. 265 quality vs file size question on the Sony A7s iii Technical Intra vs H265 vs H264 I used to record with my iPhone in H. 265 100M = 14dB So even when h. At what point does it make sense to go with h264 instead when only quality is concerned? I imagine that a 5GB h264 wouldn't be much better than a 4GB h265. 264), and there are currently three groups who claim you must license with them to use it. my recommendation would be to re-rip it all in h265. 264 at 100mbps h. I have been using h264 8-bit for SDR, and the h264 10-bit for the HDR versions. 264 and compare. 265: Can provide similar or better quality at lower bitrates, leading to smaller file sizes. But bitrate doesn't seem to be the problem, as changing that setting has absolutely no effect on h265 not streaming as smoothly. that being said, the only thing giving you an actual 1:1 rip would be avc/remux, i believe. If Basically it boils down to WHY you would use h265 over h264. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement different encoding. All with OBS, apples to apples - using the same encoder preset and the same game scene and CQP or bitrate target. 265 will “look better”. 264+ at 400+ bitrate just looks so clear especially on godlike. 264 is supported by literally every single device that can play media. I'm struggling to find a balance here. 264 is 10-bit 422 in All-I. Also, with other encoding settings, it's easy to bloat an encode without perceived quality gain. 264 can sometimes get better results in terms of image quality, especially in terms of fine detail and preservation of film grain. 264 is mainly for compatibility with more external video editors and/or less powerful computers. Also, for anyone curious, here is the results of my Hitfilm Express vs DaVinci Resolve comparison. 265 is a patent-encrusted cluster (even more than H. From there, use your ProRes 422 master to encode to whatever h. But H265 requires much more processing power of SoC than H264. 264, let's say the file is 1 gb, AV1 output is like 100 mb, and H. 264 is still gold standard for compatibility. 4. Most Blu-rays are also natively in H. I don't know how its quality is. My camera natively records in h264. For instance my video encoded in H265 at 45k kb/s is 244 MB with a 1h 24min encode time and VMAF of 98. 09. However i've stumbled accross this subreddit and been reading that anything 4k should use the h265 codec. for equivalent quality you'd be using up anywhere from half to a quarter of the space. Am I doing anything wrong? Shouldn't VP9 and H265 look pretty much the same (and have the same size as well)? Also, VP9 takes a long time to encode, compared to H265. Hi, I wonder what is the best codec for archival between h264 or h265, which codec will be easily readable by devices in 10 or 20 years ? h264 is widespread these days and h265 comes slowly to replace it (I can only read h265 on computer, my smartphone and my TV can't read it), I think it will easily readable in a few years but is h265 will last as long as h264 ? I use airlink, h264 at 400mbps. Discussion Ive been out of the loop with HTPC and movies for a while and ive noticed I know that the codec is newer and theoretically gives same performance with smaller filesizes, but in the GH6 the H. 10 bit support was kind of hacked into h264, and as far as I can tell, HW decoders mostly don't support it, but software players work with it perfectly. 26* vs x. 2 and ran through numerous tests today. 264\5 out of resolve is only viable for fixed bitrate when you know what bitrate you need. x264 and x265 are open source encoder implementations of the H. There's just too much compression. 264 or whatever after export. 41 gigs. 265 and H. Final file size was 6. If you plan on compressing, H. Am I screwing something up, or have others seen this result? When I export with h265 settings the file size is 3x bigger than h. Davinci Resolve and AVID are notorious for bad h264 mp4's where I always had to export prores/DNxHD/HR to Handbrake while Premiere and Final Cut has less issues with h264's. 422 is probably a non-issue. 264: Still widely used for streaming due to its compatibility with older devices and its established presence. The encoder makes a significant difference in high speed game footage. 9MB total I'd suggest your own tests with movement, and some pixel peeping to see which gives you the results you want (detail, noise pattern, etc). X264 and x265 are the cpu encoders for h264 and h265 respectively. Since converting an entire collection to h265 would also take a significant amount of time, that becomes another factor you have to balance. CTUs process information more efficiently, which results in a smaller file size and less By default H264 and h265 are defined as lossy codecs because they are designed to compress and throw away information to make them smaller to help streaming and playback. Turing supposedly improved h. 4:2:0 would make text harder to read and is better for movies. When working exclusively with ProRes in Premiere, it’s a good idea to export to the exact same ProRes profile and then transcode to h. 264. 264 footage. You might be wondering, in the battle of H264 vs. 264 vs H. 265 processes information using coding tree units (CTUs). 265 50M = 12dB h. 265 export, one of which is “extreme“. 265, and AV1 video encoding capabilities in speed, file size, and quality to see which encoders can properly save the most space for their speeds. On UHD I’m set on keeping everything h265 10 bit because of hdr and that’s also the default codec for the disc anyway. H265 in theory provides more storage as it compresses differently, but part of that compression means it macro blocks big areas of the image that it thinks isn't moving. On H. For 4k60, I'd go with 60 mbit h265 over 100 mbit h264. I don't need them vastly smaller, but I was hoping for at least 90% of the filesize or less than an equivalent H. 57, but with H264 at 60k kb/s the file is 250 MB with a 2. There is also nvenc So, when downloading a file, I assume the quality of a h265 video would be better than a h264 video of the same file size. 264 vs h. H. Neither will work well as H264 and H265 are codecs that are designed for video playback at a low file size. AV1 is like 30% faster (I'm monitoring the Video encoder load and power usage and playing at 4k 120fps) and thus you can use a slower profile and get much better quality vs HEVC. 264/265 - Shutter’s got better codecs ;-) It really depends on your use case, though. At equal bitrates, h. 264 movies in Handbrake at the highest setting. the difference being that at the same bitrate, h265 gives you better pic quality, however, h264 is less demanding and you can crank it up to great results. No h264 or h265 file is close to prores. 265 Camera Video Hello, I was looking 👀 to replace my cameras until I noticed the compression used on Ubiquiti cameras are the h. 264 filesize) but how much of a deal that is depends on the nature of the actual content you're encoding. I would argue the h. 265 codecs. 265 files, I eventually must export my edited videos in H. If you try to pull a key there will be a ton of blocking on something like h264 and the edges will look terrible, a ton of other things are more difficult because the quality is not there. For those videos that I don't care about the quality 100% I put in a folder for future conversion to h265 to save on space. H264 is more widely compatible with players, h265 is newer and allows for similar video quality with lower bitrates. Interframe vs Infraframe codecs: “There are intraframe and interframe codecs. x264 is the best implementation. If its good enough for Apple and Netflix, its probably good enough for you too. 265 is a successor of H. Take a look at these to get into H265 and learn more about H265 vs H264: The Miracle of Video Compression. 5x more time than H264. 264 on the other hand is more widespread and is one of the standard codecs for video content on the Internet. 264 is better in that department. 265 might make sense and you won't loose any quality from your original H. In shaded areas for example, or if there's fog. 265 (HEVC) is an amazing codec. 264 processes frames of video using macroblocks, while H. H265 is higher quality at the same bitrate, but H264 300Mbps beats H265 200Mbps on Like I said, this is interesting data, doesn't 100% line up with what I've seen, but I'm not trying to encode a library of files that may have already been compressed. Jul 30, 2022 · (Or, you can increase quality for the same bandwidth. 265 use bother intraframe and interfaces compression. 264 versions and air link being better than VD's h. On the computer that I use to encode movies in Handbrake, the H. 87 while the H265 file was 435 MB at VMAF 99. 265 can be hard on old HW to decode on the fly so run some test footage through your main device first. Testing both at a high end of 80k kb/s, the H264 file was 264 MB at VMAF 98. 265 is mainly used for TV and high quality streaming distribution. 264\5 export out of resolve leaves a lot to be desired. I always convert H265 to H264 when sharing videos with friends/neighbours. Hitfilm: Exported in 18:01 DaVinci H264: Exported in 8:34 DaVinci H265: Exported in 7:02 I just realized compressing the large collage in PNG muted the differences a little. I'm on to the latest v1. 9MB total H265 46mbps 170. 26*). 264, but noticed that file-sizes are much smaller, if I use H. H265 by nature is designed for streaming (the likes of Netflix, Disney+ and such) so the lower the bitrate the better the encoder actually becomes compared to H264. They are not codecs. But a lot of devices still don't have hardware support for h265 because of the licensing situation, and early on there were a lot of garbage h265 releases, leaving default settings like film grain removal on. But I also imagine that a 25GB h264 would be better than a 4GB h265 H265 10 bit 4000kbps 2 pass video with very fast preset Or H264 8bit 5000kbps 2pass with medium/slow preset ? I just want to find the best balance of quality/file size/speed for 1080p. 264 versus h. 265 is higher quality and smaller file sizes than H. What I'd like to do is get effectively the same quality or slightly better with smaller file sizes than, say, a veryslow H. com However, H264 is capable of doing higher bitrates than H265 (H264 can go up to ~960mbps but H265 struggles past ~200mbps) If you have a very good network setup you'd best off using H264 at a higher bitrate (400 or above), but most people will be better off using H265 since their network won't be able to handle higher H264 bitrates. AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) is an open, royalty-free video coding format initially designed for video transmissions over the Internet. H265/HEVC is a video codec. You can see in the "H. No for various reasons. 265 at 50mbps h. Just buy a big SSD and convert to DNxHR or ProRes. Scenes without much motion can be compressed more efficiently than high motion scenes. Reply reply The only place I see artifacting while playing (Pico 4 HEVC) is in large low contrast areas. All implementations of H. 265 looks better, then the bitrate was not sufficient for h H. You will find RAW and ProRes nearly identical, but h. However, if you want more versatility and fewer playback issues, H. 265 codecs are 10-bit 420 in LongGOP, whereas the H. 264 power something like the Geforce 1650 Super (with it's Volta-based GPU) would be a good bang for your buck. Use Shutter rather than Media Encoder for h. Actual bitrate limitation of H265 Air Link is 200~250Mbps. 265 for the 360 mod, I guess that H. The PCs where I need to disable acceleration are newish with decent NVidia cards. Ran into an interesting one as I was doing some test files where the h265 file ended up being 30% bigger than the originating h264 (1. 264, so if you're storing footage H. It was developed as a successor to VP9 by the Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia), a consortium founded in 2015 that includes semiconductor firms, video on demand providers, video content producers, software development companies and web browser vendors. The choice between them should be based on h. the h265 is the allintra that -long story short- allows the camera to capture the whole frame as it is while the h264 on the other hand makes the camera save some parts of the frame while it Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now H. 264 can actually edge out in quality over h. 265, not on the features of x264 vs x265. It's the price you pay for excellent compression though. 264 encodes outperform poorly done 4GB/ep h. Quality is dependent on video captured, but overall, h265 looks better at lower bitrates than h264. 264 encode. Some stuff to watch out on x265: Bigger blocking artifacts caused by huge CTU sizes, excessive blur (sao), banding (aq-mode=3 and using the 10-bit encoder can hep), thin banding/halo (manipulate psy options to counter this). 264 or h. either that or blu ray iso. Handbrake H264 with CRF 23 reduced the file to a quarter, but H265 took 3. and AV1 about 5. 265 quality and performance a bunch over Pascal/Volta, but h. GPU's in the 5000 series ans newer from AMD support hardware H265 (source I have 5700 xt) and 3000 series and newer from nvidia should be fine. What I've seen is that with original source footage if I choose H. 265 and h. Many devices don't support H265/HEVC tho. x264 and x265 are the encoders (that's the difference between h. 265: What do they mean? There’s a big “it depends” factor, but you get something close to 30-50% better compression in h. There is also nvenc Also, keep in mind h265 is really just an advanced extension to the h264 encoding method, just made much more complex. H264 vs H265 vs AV1 vs Resolve H265 for archiving I have some ~480p lectures (less movement) which has around 1800kbps and want to reduce size for archiving them. 264 after H. 265 results in cost-saving when it comes to data storage. However, for the size it is incredible and still very good that is why streaming uses h. Archived post. ) H. 264 and h. 4GB, Handbrake 1080p h265 fast RF 20). After some tinkering, I realized that if I kept all things the same but changed my encoder from NVENC HEVC (which I have been using from the beginning) to NVENC H. If you've ever tried to use ffmpeg to convert to/from various formats you will understand the frustration. They are just the software that creates video in h26x format. At the end of the day, most places AV1 will be used, aren’t using H265 anyway, they’re still on H264 because it’s free, so it’s a net gain in almost all of those situations But for my own media storage I won’t be converting anything I already have to AV1 As a VFX artist. 265 resulting in the same size files as h. 265 will get you noticably better image quality; but the time to encode it will be an order of magnitude more. As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. This lets you take advantage of smart rendering. h265 10-bit does not 10 bit is a part of h265 standard, and every device that supports decoding of h265 should support 10 bit, too (because HDR works with 10 bit). Or do I just move the un-encoded files to my server and let Plex transcode to h264? 8 – You can now save 360 video with H. The main reasons for choosing a video codec such as H. Make sure you use the NVenc encoder if you have a recent Nvidia GPU. Compressing my Videos. temsk geutmi lox jzwbye pkroiucp hjwkpm nnrv dnhbjr inhh ddnwyj