Debian image builder ubuntu reddit. A search for Debian followed by two clicks and done.
Debian image builder ubuntu reddit . Yes, you can and it does a very good job, at least for the Archer C7. I switched from Ubuntu to Debian like 3 years before. I like the stability of Debian, but I also like the speed of patches arriving in Ubuntu, for Internet-facing stuff. Debian is stable (by and large, Sid exists but not really what Debian is known for). The real issue is when you start replacing/adding official Ubuntu repositories, that will for sure screw things up, because most likely that is screwing with essential libraries and packages your system uses. A search for Debian followed by two clicks and done. iso. (Ubuntu's a snail compared to debian) Although Ubuntu Debian or Debian based distros, namely Ubuntu, have been the path of least resistance for me for many years. Since you probably have a working network card, you want the small image, and there are links right on that page. Is anyone here using Image Builder to generate VMware templates? Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. There's two obvious alternative options, though: either build a wholly new image. Combined with a wsl. For the pi5 they changed the layout of where the kernel and initramfs are stored. But as Ubuntu is not binary compatible with Debian, installing Ubuntu packages on Debian will cause you grief at some point. wget is priority standard, which means netinst and other debian-installer images will install it unless you deselect the "standard system utilities" task on the tasksel screen. Docker desktop is a product to be able to run Linux based containers on Windows/MacOS. Sorry mate, took a while for me to notice your reply as i dont use reddit much. As mentioned in the title, it is a lightweight desktop environment (300mo compressed size) that you can access from your web browser, I could make the image smaller with the alpine os but since I am more familiar with Debian-based distros I used Debian-slim image as the base. ) Debian is great, the GUI is fairly outdated but that can be fixed fairly easy. I don't know if cockpit has any support for it, you might have to install cloud-init tools somewhere and manually generate a seed image. Also debian has way less overhead compared to Ubuntu (debian uses less then 100mb of ram on its own). So it wouldn't be too much of a change. This also leads to a lot of unnecessary stuff running, however, and Canonical, the company that manages Ubuntu, seems to mess with some packages which can result in things running worse overall. Debian is captained by a volunteer group, Ubuntu is captained by Canonical - there is much more of a profit motive behind Ubuntu, for better or etcetera. RISC-V (pronounced "risk-five") is a license-free, modular, extensible computer instruction set architecture (ISA). But, I did install Arch for the first time the other day. But the LTS support extending for 10 years would be great for us. I built it with docker build --no-cache -t test_image . I then tried Debian and it all seems to be working. Even when I was still on Ubuntu I spend whole nights trying to get it to work. Even the guys suggesting Ubuntu don't trust canonical that much. Ubuntu does like to use Snapcraft which I hate because applications tend to take a long time to start (like 8 seconds for Firefox instead of 2 on my computer) and it also clutters my df output. You may have to initially setup sudo permission for your user in debian (if I remember correctly, ubuntu does it by default). Great community we have here. It's really hard to get a Debian not working anymore. There is a segment of the Debian community that actually cares about the whole "100% free software" thing. Debian is community run so the focus isn't to be the highest selling brand. 7cb4d70. Fedora doesn't have much forks, I haven't used any Fedora based distros personally but i installed RHEL on a vm and tried to install CentOS stream, if you want something I'd strongly recommend Debian if you intend to further distribute Linux outside your organisation. My question is - how did it run? Isn't musl library (which comes with Alpine) different from glibc which comes with Ubuntu? In that case, the binary should Hi Reddit, I am currently writing a server in Go and I would like to build a docker image for that. Preferably ships with a super light DE. I honestly wish they would also include GCC and other build tools as an option to avoid the chicken-or-egg problem of not being able to compile network drivers without an internet connection (to download the build tools) and not being able to connect to the internet without the network drivers. Debian doesn't include any non-free software by default, you have to opt-in for it, so if Wi-Fi doesn't work on Debian but does on Ubuntu then it's because the drivers are non-free. However, for VMware it only spits out a vmdk. You can build images like this using debbootstrap. For learning, I'd suggest Slackware, since it's about the most bare Linux distro that stays where you put it (i. when I installed Kubuntu it didn't have me setup as a super user so I couldn't use sudo commands. kvm always ubuntu 20 unless ubuntu 18 is required, hate the frequent updates but has a recent kernel and packages, also snap is included who comes sometimes in handy, also lxd and lxc proxmox well debian cos we got no choice for my bare metals i run centos as i want to avoid rebooting those as much as possible, need those stable as possible Debian had issues installing grub, Wasn't my experience and I've been doing this for years, maybe we can shed more light by knowing more details about the story. by the way, Ubuntu packages are mostly based on Debian testing packages. They used the free and open source Debian to make a profit. It's a bit slow, but no errors or warnings apart from that. People suggest debian sid but that's not pratical for most people to be running since from what I've seem it's basically debian's dev channel. But I learned that I also run other distro image like Ubuntu, Debian, etc with Toolbx. and let me stress this again: don't run non-LTS ubuntu releases. Debian have a guide in the handbook for checking authenticity. It is also possible that live images do not install wget. If Debian is too advanced, or you simply dont like it, you can look into Linux Mint, which is a popular OS for newbies based on Debian. graphical tools for install and configure also What about them? Debian has had graphical install for over a decade and there are graphical tools for pretty much everything. debs are only advertised as Ubuntu not Debian, but they can work on both OSs. For Debian installer images or Debian live images, you MUST select the "DD" writing mode -- ISO mode will alter the copy of the image on the target media (confirmed August 27, 2021, using rufus version 3. 04 LTS by porting alternative (and newer) versions of GLIBC Hi everybody, basically the main issue of the AppImages that cannot run on older systems is the GLIBC version installed on the host. If Autodesk, Filmlight, The Foundry, SGO*, and whatever other major players I'm forgetting all end up on Debian, then we'll probably see Resolve for Debian Trying to run newer AppImages (for Debian Sid) on old Ubuntu 18. Ubuntu flavors use only Ubuntu repository software, and are all runtime adjustment free, as all flavor teams have upload privileges to Ubuntu repositories (largely 'universe' or the community repository). Hello, I want to use Linux because Windows 7 support ended for a long time and I don't want to stick with Windows 10 bloatware. 3 so may have better device support for newer systems than LM 20. Currently uploading Ubuntu image to It is, it’s no longer maintained so it was in the archive and that was the last image they published. Ubuntu, Mint, PopOS, and more are all based on Debian. 04 LTS, I might be running it right now. Ubuntu 20. Ubuntu focusses on being more user-friendly. I havn't done debian on a pi 5 yet, but I have built many debian images for the RP to have luks and btrfs. Ubuntu does something similar, except that it does it with Debian unstable packages (rather than testing), and it does it more often (every six months), which means less quality control than Debian stable (but still enough for a lot of people, as shown by the fact that Ubuntu is so popular). Edit: I do know how to use a command line. You can always get newer packages on Debian 10 either by building from source or adding other package sources. Then I run with Toolbx and I basically have Ubuntu running, I can run O3DE Debian package there. Originally designed for computer architecture research at Berkeley, RISC-V is now used in everything from $0. 04 image which is close enough to Debian that I don't mind, once snapd and some other crap is removed. Red Hat introduced the UBI (Universal Base Image) back in 2019 to facilitate ease of adoption for RHEL-like containers. Exactly. Ubuntu is based on the Debian "Unstable" release train because it has newer versions of packages. 15). For now, I simply gave up because the errors make no sense and I have spend A LOT of time reporting the issue (it's on their Github). It seems good at spitting out amis and vhds for AWS and Azure. Not sure how to describe it, just feels ignored. For 90% of users the only package where the version will actually matter is Google Chrome. appimagelauncher_2. If you want to do low-level/kernel development, you'll most likely want to deep dive and generate your own firmware/distro Debian is definitely more lightweight than Ubuntu, since Ubuntu's approach to making an OS is "load everything and the kitchen sink at boot to make sure everything you might ever want to do Just Works™". I have a bash script that has all the code you need to make a debian/ubuntu image that can be written to a USB with persistance via UnionFS filesystem mounting a separate partition. You can use non-free firmware Debian images to get Wi-Fi going. But I have to admit Ubuntu has more packages to offer and sometimes it may be easier to use Ubuntu since some developers offer a repo for their software for Ubuntu but not Debian. Then all of a sudden reboot wouldn't work and then it just would not respond to anything. deb. At this moment I'm kinda stuck between two choices, as I prefer debian based. Correct. You have to build the image using debootstrap and a chroot with qemu. io tends to lag versions behind docker-ce, but if you want to stick to the Debian way, go with docker. Sometimes, unfortunately, . CentOS was the standard because of stability reasons, but I don't think there's been any indication as to what distro is replacing it. They consider their systems "contaminated" if there' I'm already happy. They are denoted by the -ubuntu-2004 suffixes in the image family name (see Listing all available versions). Debian "stable" is in practice Debian "old" or Debian "not found". Ubuntu is sadly going downhill since 20. com with the ZFS community as well. I've mostly used nothing but Ubuntu MATE in recent years but I started feeling concerned about all the drama and baggage (Ubuntu Pro, increasing reliance on snap) and since Ubuntu is based on Debian it's like 95% the same so everything is still pretty familiar. My plan is to install either a very minimal ubuntu or debian distro. At that time already a good number of voices could be heard indicating and/or advocating a move to Debian or Ubuntu. I personally run Debian 11 with ZFS root following their instructions here . Due to the closed source restrictive nature, Ubuntu is more closed than debian. If you're talking about the TurnKeyLinux ones, those are in fact based on Debian. Theres nothing wrong with Ubuntu but if you want to squeeze all the performance out of your system debian is probably the way. Some of the actions provided by debos to customize and produce images are: • apt: install packages and their dependencies with `apt' • debootstrap: construct the target rootfs with debootstrap • download: download a single file from the internet • filesystem-deploy: deploy a root filesystem to an image previously created • image Obviously there are scenarios where an Ubuntu package may be fine on a Debian system (e. 04. xx LTS didn't boot for me when i tried, although i suspect that's more to do with how i prepped the pendrive (it was literally one of the first distro's i tried on this 3~4 months back. Thank you for the help, will probably make a troubleshooting post soon! Live is a pre-selected default of packages. I had only good experiences with Ubuntu, even major version updates have always worked just fine. Also, popsicle isn't a default app in Ubuntu, so like 99% of what people might actually be unsure of, is not covered. Ubuntu is based on Debian so they are quite similar, but Ubuntu does tend to update more frequently than Debian. It makes it easier for noobies to work with. Otherwise, when setting up a container from scratch, you're free to use any of the distros Proxmox supports, including Alpine. Besides that Ubuntu has a focus on user-friendliness, so they ship an opinionated distro. Steam and Wine are available in Debian. An iso with lots of preloaded packages is a godsend when you are installing offline. 4-travis987. Ubuntu uses a custom kernel, debian does not. I’ve looked into the same or similar thing. However, wouldn't it make sense to just use alpine as it's way smaller, and pre-build the Go application? Debian proxmox runs best on debian (it's critically important for a hypervisor to have as stable a foundation as possible, they picked debian for a reason. Yet somehow the base install ISO for ubuntu is 60 MB and the base for debian is 300 MB. Many Linux users want the new and shiny. I'm thinking of running Kubuntu 21. 04, with snaps taking over even on the server release. Debian 11 is the current "stable" release meaning updates are almost exclusively security updates and there are few of any major updates. I chose Ubuntu because it has ZFS supported by the distro vendor and it’s a very common distro for ZFS and Kubernetes/k3s. Thanks, it was the web browser I was lacking, silly me. Last year, they started distributing UBI via the Docker Hub registry. org/software/raspberrypi/rpi2-build-image. Not good enough to do everything with the command line. The future versions of this tool will be more generalized, allowing users to build a wider range of Ubuntu images, including ISO/installer. I used to run kubuntu before that with the kubuntu-backports for the latest KDE. Other tool installations will be shown below as we go along. Debian and Ubuntu based distros have the most market share. Contribute to pyavitz/debian-image-builder development by creating an account on GitHub. A rolling release distro featuring a user-friendly installer, tested updates and a community of friendly users for support. Just a bit scared of it since I don't know Debian or anything about servers. I came to the conclusion that it mostly doesn’t matter too much. Download the live ISO. Everything is recompiled with the new gcc/glibc versions, compilation and other bugs patched and sent upstream. 0 _Buster_ - Unofficial amd64 DVD Binary-1 with firmware 20200208-12:08]/ buster contrib main non-free However apt update is complaining about security and refuses to consider the new added "cdrom" repo as a valid source. list for it to show up as being available. deb, consistency of environment between development and production (there may be cases where you only run in docker in some scenarios but not others) if Alpine works, that's great, but it is a different software stack and that glibc/musl difference sometimes causes problems that are hard to track down: if you are only using Alpine to shave off a few UPDATE: will be staying with Ubuntu server Thanks for all the advice. The Ubuntu images are not as big anymore and I can imagine that the python image with debian base got more cves and is bigger than Ubuntu with "manually" installed python. I was introduced to Linux in 2009, and I've been using Debian/Ubuntu-based ditros ever since. Finally consider that Ubuntu is Debian unstable sources frozen, patched and compiled with the Ubuntu sauce: they look different but the DNA is the same. I've always used debian based distro and know my way around well enough with them, but I've seen some people using Redhat and was won One thing to keep in mind, Orange Pi and all these other Chinese "fruit clone" manufacturers are notorious for releasing one OS image then never updating it again. Ubuntu has non-free(-firmware) enabled by default (called restricted), making the install easier when you needed those non-free things. 04 . Finally, there is the Ubuntu 22. Note that this choice usually implies you're using a stock kernel. Ubuntu LTS releases are based on Debian testing branch. So I guess you can also try this option. you will not have a that much different experience. Ubuntu merges Debian unstable every cycle, a small portion of those packages receive additional patches, and an even smaller number of packages are unique to Ubuntu. With Debian Testing/Unstable you are using the distro as a Debian tester/developer, and all the release policies, but triage, etc. Subreddit to discuss all the Debian things, the Universal Operating System Personally I'd go CentOS/Rocky but Debian is a very good choice as well. Ubuntu is also closed source locked into defaults by Canonical. These surface differences are fine, but it's worth considering the differences at the helms, which give context to the surface and an idea about future directions. The differences to consider when picking between Ubuntu/Debian are: Release versions Default configs in your DE. not a rolling release like Arch: cool if you're up for it, but not a great learning environment because things change underfoot and sometimes the breakage isn't you, which is an enthusiasm-killer right when you can least afford it). And, yes pretty much anything that could run Ubuntu can run Debian, it just may be a matter of adding non-free and contrib to the apt sources. It double sucked compared to just using docker CLI on Debian. by less user-friendly it may mean that debian will not automatically install nvidia driver for example, but hey, that is really simple if you google it. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. PPAs aren't a Debian thing, and you should probably not try to use them. The way Debian/Ubuntu work you get 5 years of support but in reality they release every 2 years so if you deploy something towards the end of that cycle you effectively only get 3 years. iso < 20 MB) downloads packages from online archives at installation time. Ubuntu is the most popular Linux distribution on both Desktop as well as for Web Servers. If Ubuntu hadn't broken Ansible in 20. I find the difference between a debian install and a ubuntu install pretty trivial, both are super straight forward. 04 with kde-backports, or run Debian 11 (maybe sid) with KDE. The Plex Media Server is smart software that makes playing Movies, TV Shows and other media on your computer simple. debianwiki Debian therefore has all of Ubuntu's CVEs and those reported directly by other distributions that use Debian as upstream (or by individuals / other entities). I’m looking to install the KDE desktop after, or a distro that is not cluttered with a bunch of apps right on. You could probably to it on a pi, but it's much easier with qemu and a debian machine. Having official support is a good way for Microsoft to signal that they are embracing WSL to people who would traditionally stray away from it and stick to native Linux. I’d say give debian a spin if you’re looking to try it out! It will feel familiar because Ubuntu is debian based, but there are a couple differences as well to keep you interested. Then tried Ubuntu but orangepi-config hung when I tried to configure wifi. Ubuntu Minimal CD (mini. It doesn‘t make sense on Linux at all and was probably ported to Linux to make it easy for companies who already use docker desktop and are depending on it. My first assumption would be that the debian install doesn't fetch as much from the network during install and just comes with it already and ubuntu has to get it at some point. a program written in Python that is compatible with the version of Python in Debian). I use Ubuntu for my desktop and laptops, so either Debian or Ubuntu are it for server OSs for me, since their administration is so similar. I would recommend debian over Ubuntu if you know how to use it. Docker. I want a Linux distro focusing on easiness and stability. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Wondering if users here prefer Debian or Ubuntu to run Plex. DIB is organized in a series of elements that build on top of each other to create specific images. ) Also I like to test automation from scratch and I love Vagrant for that purpose. Ubuntu are a bit more interested in up-to-date package versions. Debian Live configuration and scripts for generating ubuntu based images, forked from elementary OS Terraform - samwhelp/budgie-iso-builder To have the final image smaller, your dockerfile has something like FROM debian:11. Debian's also been around a lot longer than Ubuntu has; and many of us just don't want to use any other linux distro, since debian runs on pretty much anything. However, I still work with ROS noetic and I heard that it can't be installed normally with binaries, it has to be done from source and that sounds like a pain. If you have hundreds or thousands of instances in your fleet, that quickly becomes cheaper to build in house. Directly changing the image seems like a profoundly terrible idea. k. Debian stable it's better suited for a server or for someone that really needs a adamantium rock solid desktop enviroment. Since you are changing things anyways, not exactly reproducing the old build shouldn't really be a problem, or use the old image as a base image in building a new image. deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10. The two are the same. There are ansible/packer combos out there that will cover a large portion of this for you, but it depends on your time & ec2 budget. Debian is quite "slow to update" (a. I want to update my system without having to think about kernel compatibility (see RedHat and ZFS) or DKMS not compiling properly (very rare apparently but If Ubuntu/Debian becomes the industry standard, maybe. Debian will not do this. I went with Debian. Fewer issues overall. Another option popular with former Windows users is the Cinnamon desktop environment (the same as Linux Mint's flagship DE). The web says that I could use the official golang (or golang:alpine ) image to start from. Oh, and yeah. I've been running Linux for around 3 years now and I can mostly manage things myself. Ubuntu will force you to use snaps to a point where if you apt install firefox it will in fact not install the snap package and not the deb. OTOH I value my time very much nowadays and investing in Debian seems - for now - a good long term strategy because of aligned incentives. 5 kernel image -amd64 Then install all the compilers dependencies Disable secure boot in system BIOS Now edit the kernel version config file Locate the conflicts with your GPU Change the module option from =m to =n run terminal command sudo update-initramfs -u This builds new kernel image Change GRUB to boot with new kernel image I admit that I'm more familiar with the debian install process than the ubuntu install process, and the ubuntu installer's that I'm familiar with have a few odd quirks, such as requiring to swapoff before setting up crypto, and It doesn't seem to allow as much customization when it comes to crypto, more automagical. Does anyone know why Debian 10 and Ubuntu 19. Click that. finnie. I read it is good for Ubuntu. No, Discord will not break anything. It's just bloated Debian and "easier to use" but Debian is easier to install than Ubuntu Server, and after that it's practically the same, no-brainer use Debian. Debian image builder for single board computers. Liking it. 1. 10 CH32V003 microcontroller chips to the pan-European supercomputing initiative, with 64 core 2 GHz workstations in between. ubuntu and debian actually are similar. 2. io Debian-based MX Linux has a really easy to use snapshot tool that comes with it that'll allow you to make either a backup ISO of your install, or your own custom redistributable distro ISO, but you'll have to add any custom desktop configs to etc/skel manually if you want to use any other DE than XFCE for a custom ISO; otherwise you'll just get the same generic desktop for that DE that Debian With debian you will potentially at some point be using a 2 year old version of gnome while with ubuntu you'll get a new release every 6 months with reasonably up to date software. Using Debian over alpine you might get a lower number of detecred issues with somethibg like snyk/trivy. 5, actually, but debian stable had an update a few months ago, whereas this ubuntu LTS has been around since april 2016. 0-amd64-gnome. Ubuntu will not give you a choice of desktop on install. Nothing wrong with that, but in the spirit of Linux it's frowned upon. So I retrieved Ubuntu 22. It's what I know, and I don't feel like learning new package management. Warning: Rufus has 2 writing modes "ISO" and "DD" mode, which you can select just before writing begins. A model assertion is a YAML file that describes a particular combination of core Yes it makes it more resource intense. So you get more recent packages compared to Debian Stable. Debian 10 and Debian 9 images have been deprecated Simplest choice is to use the debian/ubuntu provided with your board. Also I've found that resizing the disk after the image has been imported doesn't work well, the disks of cloned VMs were still the original size (for ubuntu 22. 1)free/nonfree. Finding the right ISO-file can be difficult, here are the latest images for amd64 live images and the latest (as of today) Debian 12 Gnome Live ISO file is debian-live-12. and you have to enable non free repos to use non free software Linux Mint isn't a flavor of Ubuntu. They arent't complete but have everything you need, it's one of the two of these. If you can take the time to experiment with Debian, maybe in dual booting, my warm recommendation is to do it- Ubuntu Debian openSUSE Pay for RHEL All of those solutions have problems so I'm really not sure what is going to happen. It's usually only a matter of time You should be fine with either. Ubuntu Minimal sounds good so far, thanks for the link! At the moment I'm trying to install debian on a remote machine, I only have ssh access to it, is has ubuntu 14. 10 which is older than what Debian 12 ships) Debian slim images are what 23 Megs? Compiling with the Debian tool gain (for CGo) is much waiter than with musl Using Debian you get tz stuff and a good set of root certs etc. It's about my personal preferences and usage much more than Ubuntu vs Debian. Did a apt upgrade and that fixed things. A lot of the FAANGS have moved to Debian on their servers in the past, and most are now requiring their technical staff to run GNOME on Debian rather than Ubuntu. $0. Turns out Google runs their own deb repo, the Chrome installer for Debian basically just adds an apt source. They can afford to advertise and make hardware deals. true. I have only tested building on WSL 1, but there's no reason that WSL 2 shouldn't work considering that the new version is more or less a VM. exe import from stdin makes a new install pretty easy. Another consideration is that Oracle builds a custom kernel and OCI-specific tools into their images and your home-brew images may perform worse, or lack various tooling/APIs assumed in the existing documentation. Then I ran it with docker run test_image and it printed Hello World!!! :-). That said, AWS Ubuntu images also ship with AWS packages pre-installed, like AWS CLI and SSM, the two most critical parts. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Desktop vs Server Image of Ubuntu 20. I have to say, there’s a lot to love. their installer is not a live like kubuntu There are live debian images. That being said, I find Debian 11 the best right now. But it works ok. Run a VM and find out for yourself I guess is my best answer to this. Great project! For me 2 handy discoveries today, Windows 10 has default curl and the Debian WSL image is available. Screen Shot Can I use this 'bionic' file for Debian. Great. There are better alternatives. Imagine the two distros as car enthusiasts, Debian is the guys who quite happy to be up to his arm pits in oil and grease tweaking his distro to get what he wants from it, where Ubuntu wants the same as the the Debian guy but does not want to be up to his arm pits in Grease and oil and is happy to let somebody else do the hard graft while he Choosing an operating system For most frameworks, Debian 11 is the default OS. (For instance ROCm forces you to use python 3. Ubuntu and Popos are both run by corporations. If you’re an experienced user, you could run Debian and make it behave like Ubuntu without any issues. So I went ahead and installed ROS 2 Humble in Ubuntu 22. 2. Dec 29, 2024 · Diskimage-builder (DIB) can build images for Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS, and openSUSE. Also, I found that Debian 12 KDE/Plasma + Wayland it's far more rock solid that on Ubuntu (at least with AMD GPU). Locale support, software packaged as . sh If it really must be an iso. Secondly, for engineering-centric companies, support is pointless. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. Or snap/app image/flatpack. It replaces GRUB and supports ZFS root on multiple flavors of Linux including Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, etc. I can provision fresh VMs in < 1 min using Vagrant. Armbian is similar to raspbian, it’s Debian based but instead of being Raspberry Pi focused, it’s a community driven OS/builder for all other ARM boards that it can manage. There are usually quite a few ubuntu-specific patches in the packages - a lot of which stem from Canonical working together with HW Vendors (there's a certification program for HW with Ubuntu). Debian are more interested in reliable package versions, even if those versions are a little bit old. How to download an ISO file. This is why it come in flavours like Gnome KDE XFCE etc. OnlyOffice, I'm still a fan, but their docker image is just riddled with issues. Debian netboot initrd image with preseed file inside seems to work in a test VM, I just replace the kernel on the current system, reboot and it installs the system with ssh server and a key automatically with 0 input, in the end I used podman on Debian with cockpit and it sucks compared to a RHEL distro's implementation. So I'm going to be upgrading from a raspberry pi to a full blown home server soon and am researching what the best OS to use is. The traditional Debian installer will ask you to provide a Fully Qualified Domain Name. Super easy. In other words, it is considered OK for Debian Testing/Unstable to enter a temporarily broken state that requires manual AWS Linux 2022 is moving to Fedora based, which throws a wrench into established workflows/build patterns, so that might be the push for my group to switch to Debian/Ubuntu instead. Decide if you want a small image (netinst) or a full image. but ubuntu LTS only has major updates every 2 years, as well. In my case I simply imported the Debian CD signing key followed by the keys of the Debian people who signed the signing key into my personal keyring. 3 came out before LMDE, the packages and kernel version in LMDE is newer than LM 20. Ubuntu was created explicitly for making Debian easy to install, and Debian developers have incorporated most of the upgrades upstream. Debian is not more complicated than Ubuntu, it is possible that at the beginning you will be a little confused but overall they are two very similar OS, Ubuntu is based on Debian. Debian is simply providing suitable tools for more situations. Systemd, like it or not - is widely becoming the defacto standard on most major distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, Arch) so a lot of people are familiar it. At 1000 instances, it's cheaper to pay someone a months salary I was hoping to be able to use it as a single tool to generate images for AWS, Azure, VMware, and bare metal. It is a complete environment ready to use ootb. I recommend the GNOME desktop environment as it is simple and fairly easy for beginners, and is well supported. Ubuntu is Debian with extra packages installed and pre-configured so you don't have to set things up. For example, the original Orange Pi Zero image released once in 2020, that will be Debian 10. With recent developments, more and more such voices are heard, as people seem to be losing faith in the future of a RHEL clone or derivative (whether that is correct is another matter). Look for 6. To me it would make a lot more sense if it output a template. The download time savings achieved by using a Minimal CD can be significant, as only current packages are downloaded, so there is no need to upgrade packages immediately after installation My first install didn't boot or turn on the lights, but I learned it was some weekly build. Debian is great for work devices due to it's great stability. To build a snap-based image with ubuntu-image, you need a model assertion. Even Dist-Upgrades work like a charm. This might mean packages change behaviour between version upgrades. Don't get too hung up on the size of an image. The Live-version will provide you with the easier Calamares installer . Currently installing Ubuntu server and docker. Thus, although non-free works are not a part of Debian, we support their use and provide infrastructure for non-free packages (such as our bug tracking system and mailing lists). g. Follow best practices and use a small base image, but don't try to micromanage/over optimize the size of your image. Usually this is due to a requirement not having an apk or single binary option while the thing is just an apt-get away with debian. And debian is more readily customizable. It is a Ubuntu based system though, and a rather nice one. ubuntu is based on debian after all. io is provided in the debian repositories and pulls in dependencies as external dependencies, whereas docker-ce is provided by docker and pulls the dependencies into the source tree. bionic_arm64. And no, you are not expected to know all images but I would expect that you can use Google and find or build the best image for the individual task. 4 which we can also download from the provided link. Those cloud images are intended to be used with cloud-init to set up the VM, including users networking etc. LMDE is a slow release distribution based on Debian Buster (11) however, since LM 20. 02/hr for an amazon linux 2 CIS hardened image means $14. In addition, Debian uses to run on a number of different hardware architectures. And looks that even Debian unstable it's more stable that Ubuntu itself. Debian is less opinionated. Debian is super stable, but not updated frequently, Ubuntu is based on Debian and Mint, Pop_OS! is based on Ubuntu. 88/mo "premium" per instance. a. As ubuntu cinnamon-remix is built with the Debian version of live-build, not the Ubuntu patched version, it's easiest to build an iso in a Debian VM or container. in the directory where I had the program and Dockerfile. Just now I found that from docker info that Docker on Debian doesn’t support the cgroup set, and the cgroup driver is set to ‘systemd’ whereas cgroup driver on Ubuntu is set to “cgroupfs”. Those directions leave you with a very bare bones install so I then finished my Debian set up (including setting a desktop environment) by executing the OpenZFS 15 votes, 66 comments. Ubuntu is Debian with training wheels. 04 images are available for some frameworks. The Debian official media may include firmware that is otherwise not part of the Debian system to enable use of Debian with hardware that requires such firmware. This prevents messing up your host system too. , are oriented towards users that are OK with that level of support (or non-support). Under the Debian result there is a link to the page Getting Debian. For questions and comments about the Plex Media Server. If Debian disappears, and none of the Ubuntu-based distros are able to pick up the slack, then I'll switch. Debian will. 3. There seems to be no issues with the Docker on Ubuntu, but with Docker on Debian, I am getting network issues within the docker container. It doesn't go into detail on how to use cloud-init to install software. The advantage with Debian is that you will have the opportunity to explore a little deeper the Linux ecosysteme with a distribution that remains very stable. (The older way is phrased to make sure that that name can receive mail from the system). Download a sums file to verify the image and the sign file can be used to verify the sums file with gnupg and the Debian Gpg keyring. Ubuntu is based on Debian Testing, which gives kind of a 'every x months' snapshot of it. TL DR: Ubuntu makes Debian more user-friendly. 10 rn. Based on my experience, Ubuntu had a lot more, recent packages. Snaps are easy enough to disable, but who knows what else they may do. Ubuntu server arm64 20. practicalzfs. I won’t go into all the debates, but why I prefer debian: Debian is community run and supported rather that Ubuntu which is run by a for-profit corporation Debian is certainly not a clone of Ubuntu. they aren't worth the trouble, unless you need a newer kernel version to make your hardware work 该项目移植自BeagleBone公司的image-builder项目，主要用于构建debian系统镜像。它的源码开放， 主要由shell脚本和配置文件构成，用户可以灵活高效地修改debian文件系统的配置， 还能根据实际项目需要在文件系统中预装某些应用软件。 Debian and Ubuntu also have different packaging philosophy. 3 AS buildenv or something along those lines ( I don't remember the right line) which process everything and then at the end you have a COPY from --buildenv which copies over to a virgo Debian container everything you needed to compile or process. they are making sure that the packages are rock solid, granite hard, diamond polish stable); you'd find Linux Mint's packages to be more updated compared to Debian. 04 LTS Toolbx image (it has to be setup specifically for toolbox, cannot use generic ISO). The Debian project is permitted to make distribution media (installer images and live images) containing packages from the non-free section of the Debian archive available for download alongside with the free media in a way that the user is informed before downloading which media are the free ones. The reddit Hive-mind has decided "Ubuntu Bad" "Arch Good" but remember that this is a social media echo-chamber, not a place well suited for serious informed discussion or nuanced opinions. docker. 04 it's around 2200MB) for me. Honestly comparing how many CVEs there are doesn't reflect the level of security in an operating system or other device. I don't like ubuntu gnome anyway ubuntu is a batteries included distro, debian can be installed as a very smol distro The 10 year support is the biggest reason to use RHEL/CentOS in an enterprise environment. By default, Debian is much more stringent than Ubuntu about using only FOSS software / drivers, but they won't restrict an end user from doing so. Is there anything else that does the same thing as virt-builder with newer os's? Apr 23, 2022 · ISO file that we shall manipulate to create custom GNU/Linux distribution for our use case, would be Ubuntu 20. I use both, but find Ubuntu easier to manage. I only have sudo privileges so tried the 'lite' AppImageLauncher file, but it didn't work. 04 are not available virt-builder images? Sid doesn't even have anything extra it seems. Forget ubuntu. Ubuntu does have a bunch of bleeding edge stuff which you can install though PPAs, but those are not really a good way of maintaining working system - with debian, you'll likely need to Almost all of the lxc containers are ubuntu based. Not the bleeding edge for sure, but better than ubuntu right out of the box, if you will. Example for a pi with ubuntu http://www. e. However, it still seems like Debian, Ubuntu and Alpine are so much more dominant in terms of adoption. ROCm is built for Ubuntu and Debian, Ubuntu has a ton of additions and changes from base Debian which makes it much more annoying and complex to use ROCm. wkzq pyji nimmyg ozvmx ucm ptitrlr diakpw wqd hgbaix qlz